Fill in your own text - Special Offer from Globat.com
Globat.com – Best eCommerce & Forum Web Hosting Plans - 2500 MB & 75 GB of data transfer for only $7.95/mo
FREE Shipping on ALL Videos,DVDs & more from The History Channel. Click Here.
First time buyers: Save $5.00 on purchases of $50.00 or more with the Half.com coupon "Holiday5"!
Stop Living with Bad Credit
Act Now - NETZERO Platinum - Get RELIABLE, UNLIMITED SURFING for only $9.95 per month.
Refinance your home to consolidate debt regardless of credit history.
Click here to learn how.
Singles Wanting Compatible Relationships
eHarmony - Take a Tour
PeoplePC Online Accelerated - 3 months, half price then $15.95/month
Refinancing Has Never Been This Easy - Free Service at 4LowRates.com
4inkjets! Discount Printer Supplies.
4inkjets - Brother:
4inkjets - Sharp:
4inkjets - Epson:
4inkjets - Panasonic:
4inkjets - Hewlett Packard:
4inkjets - Canon:
Use this coupon:
DEC55 - 10% OFF! (minimum purchase $55 -Expires 01/05/05)
Life Insurance in 10 minutes or less if qualified. No medical exam. AmericanLifeDirect.com. The world's fastest life insurance policy?
Comments from readers
New California Republic posts a select number of responses both pro and con. If you would like to contribute a longer, thoughtful essay favoring one view or another, please submit it to info@newCaliforniarepublic.org. Paste your comments in the body of the email. No attachments please. Thank you for visiting New California Republic.
||Read the book Ecotopia, It may have been written in 1970 but
it gives a realistic view of what could happen with an independent
California (and Oregon and Washington).
--Jedediah (Santa Clara, CA)
||During the Reagan years in the White House, I often thought
of secession, but it seemed an impossible task. I'm beginning to think
it really could happen, especially now there is a much clearer threat
to our economy and culture. I am so angry with the direction of the US,
and am ready to begin serious debate on California secession.
--Walter (Hayward, CA)
MascuringErection ring for men!https://mascuring.com/
||I have thought for the last ten years or so that secession
for California and the other 'blue' states is inevitable. The
Progressive States of America has a nice ring to it, actually. States like New
York and California will not sit idly by and watch decades of progress
on civil rights issues and the environment go by the wayside because
the Xtians want to take the country back to God...back to the days when
segregation ruled and gays were stuck in the closet out of fear for
--Ray (Sacramento, CA)
||We need to leave, take Oregon, Washington and most of Nevada
(who cares about Las Vegas but without Black Rock mesa the kids will
need passports to go to Burning Man, and I think Area 51 and all the UFOs
should be ours) and offer Baja a chance to join us, as well.
We need to join the European Union. We think the same. We need to do a
lot more, but that can be explained later.
--Michael (-----, CA)
||I think this is a fantastic idea. I love America, but the rest of the country is way out of touch with the Left Coast. Let's do this now!
--Carly (La Jolla, CA)
||Ca imports elec. water. If indepen-dent, no more sweetheart
deals on these necessities. Have to get own nuclear waste dump site.
Braindrain to come as Livermore & Jet Propulsion Labs leave. No more FEMA
money for disaster relief. How will Ca pay for the land the
U.S.military presently occupies? With the existant state finances cannot even
afford Camp Pendelton.
--Jim (Phoenix, AZ)
||How do you intend to carry out your
political program? What strategies,
primary tactics and alternative tactics
have you in mind to achieve your goal?
Have you printed a comprehensive
program on how a Free California can
do better than the United States of
Gilead? To win over large blocs of
people, it is crucial that you have
a thorough program on what changes,
if any, that you wish to make. Also,
you may need to form alliances and
short-term united fronts in the drive
towards California taking its rightful
place in the international community,
divorced from the Fundamentalist regime
now unfolding. I am willing to help.
--Jesse (San Francisco, CA)
||What a Joke! Why is California ignored? Because it fails to
participate. We sent Boxer and Pelosi and as absolute demogogues. Don't
forget, the vast majority of land mass in California voted for Bush.
But the elitist in L.A. and Frisco, who believe they know everything, are
the major voter block. Given independence we would be subject to their
rule. Given a choice between more conservative values and more liberal
values I choose the former, because in the long run I will maintain my
freedom to choose.
I send one child to public school and one child to private school. The
difference is amazing. In one, the government tells me what my child is
going to learn and in the other, I can choose.
Look at the California public schools and you see the future of a
--Greg (San Diego, CA)
||you liberals like to talk about how it is a waste, of all
the lives lost in iraq, and of course the vietnam war. well, if all of
you liberals are truly antiwar, then maybe you ought to educate yourself,
on how many died during the civil war on both sides (600,000). you do
realize that a states right to succeed(sic) was decided by the civil war, but
you liberals have tried reinventing history, so much, you probably
||I'm glad we're finally talking about this. Our state made
this nation what it is (or was), and now we are being treated like
second-class citizens. I've always been proud to be Californian first and
American second. I'm proud to be from a progressive state that's always on
the cutting edge when it comes to human rights and civil liberties.
Let's start by seceding economically and see how much the reds miss the
dollars that come from the world's fifth largest economy.
--Gabriel (San Francisco, CA)
||Although I believe unity is of more value than divisiveness, a state of northern california sounds alright to me.
--Russell (Berkeley, CA)
Via a link from Best of the Web Today on opinionjournal.com, I read your article on “Red babies, Blue babies.” There was something elsewhere on the site that indicated that it was satire, but after reading a few other articles, I think there are some stereotypes used frequently on moveoncalifornia.org that I would like to refute.
I consider myself a Conservative Christian in a Red State (Texas). My parents are Conservative Christians living in the same Red State. Therefore, I must:
1) Either homeschool my kid or send him to a Christian school (or want Creationism taught as science in the public schools).
2) Not understand sound scientific methods.
3) Not practice birth control.
4) Be narrowly educated.
5) Want to spend money taxed from people in Blue States.
It’s a sample, and I could go on, but that’ll do.
Here’s the truth of the matter:
I’m 32 with only one child, and it’s because I’m a firm believer in birth control, to the point of abstaining if no other method is available.
My child will attend public school when he starts kindergarten next year. I received my very scientific education at a place called the California Institute of Technology. I still have a soft spot for California (and I have a multitude of good friends there), and I return when I can (about once a year on average).
I would like federal income and outlay vastly reduced for everyone (all I want D.C. to do is: “provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”).
You may think that my political views are wrong, but you would be quite mistaken to dismiss me as an uneducated Bible-thumper, as is so often done on your web site.
Secession is hardly necessary. How about, instead, reducing the size and scope of the federal government, thereby increasing the autonomy of the several states? Do you want civil unions (or marriage) for homosexual couples in California? Knock yourselves out. Do we want to prohibit illegal aliens from getting driver’s licenses in Texas? We can do that.
As for the power of California’s representatives being marginalized in the federal government, it has considerably less to do with red and blue than it does with population and the bicameral legislature. States with low populations tend to get more federal dollars (proportionally) because their senators have power equal with those of the large states; throwing a little money at them to get the votes of the senators is done quite a bit. If less money were spent on tasks that do not rightly belong to the federal government, the inequity would decline. It’s also the case that a LOT of money is spent in and around D.C. on the bureaucracy, and even if everything were fair among the states, California would not get back a dollar in federal spending for each dollar it sent in taxes.
--Bryce (Houston, TX)
||I cannot tell you how glad I am to see that the enlightened
elites of this country have finally realized that they can never remake
the U.S. to their own liking. Leaving IS your best option! I only
wish you'd thought of it sooner. There is something dishonest about a
minority whose views are radically out-of-sync with the majority
attempting to impose its dogmas and doctrines by any means possible. Perhaps
you might also consider joining Canada or the E.U. if the solo option
--A.M. (Boston, MA)
||Can we bring a few blue states with us? Maybe New York?
--Paula (Los Angeles, CA)
||Secession is not really an option. Sorry...this would not
ever come to fruition, not ever, without it leading to another war.
Instead, why not look to the FreeState Project currently under way in New
Hampshire? I think that both Democrats and Republicans are looking to
support the original vision of our Founding Fathers, albeit in their own
fashion. The Free State Project is trying to do specifically that by
limiting the influence of the Federal Government on State's Rights.
--Kurt (Chino Hills, CA)
||I have been perusing your site from time to time
since the beginning of December, and I have yet to see you address the fact
that while the majority of population in the state lives in "Blue"
counties, a careful look at this year's county-by-county results would
indicate that only 21 out of 58 of California counties voted blue - and
perforce would be in favor of secession because of the alleged
What would you say to the citizens of the 37 counties - comprising the
entire Central Valley, Sierra Nevada (excepting Alpine County) and High
Desert - who were in support of this President during the election?
Would you make them come along by hook or by crook? And if so, what
makes you different from what the Electoral College and those mean
--James (Roseville, CA)
||Thank you for exploring this option and for recognizing the
dire situation we are facing. I'm sure there will be extensive
opposition, but could you tell me what might be expected of a committee member?
I am committed to many of the illegal alien issues, the deregulation of
the national forests, and the disappearance of wildlife and the land
that formerly sustained them. Thank you for you attention.
--Liz (Hayward, CA)
||If this effort is to be led by anyone as dumb as Jeff it
will surely fail. His article about the beliefs of Red State Christian
families was so false and phony that he must be smoking some of that
famous CA weed.
A Red Book survey on sex found overwhelming evidence that conservative
Christians have more sex with more orgasims and more joy doing it. They
use more birth control, (Catholics do not use, Evangelicals do
use,)have fewer babies out of wedlock and fewer abortions.
They adopt more needy babies, do more charity and give more money to
the poor and needy. Evangelicals are winnning by doing more. Liberals
have less sex, kill their babies and fail to teach their children right
and wrong so they become conservatives to find good values.
Just look at the giving to countries affected by the killer wave.
Almost all charitable work is done by Evangelicals. Liberals spend their
money on wilderness treks that feed them wine and cheese while Christians
tend the earth and God created.
Rather than secede, just go to Canada and let the conservatives take it
over sooner than we are going to now. After the Hispanics get wise they
will vote with us in massive numbers and the Golden State will really
be gold for democracy and capitalism as well as Evangelical fervor.
--Gary (Symmes Twp, OH)
||I've been telling people California should secede from the
US for several years now. The Republican controlled Congress set the
stage for their takeover. Bush gave no help to CA after Enron raped our
state, and even put them on the back burner to go after Martha Stewart,
and CA was never paid back. Instead, it was used to engineer the recall
coup. CA has enough resources to be our own nation and it would be a
devistating economic blow to the US. America is not a democracy anymore,
but a fascist theocracy rapidly establishing a police state; it must be
abandoned. Along with Oregon and Washington (not to mention Vermont)
also seeking secession, we could take the entire coast from this illegal
regime, and it's high time we did so!
--Fred (Ventura, CA)
||After having read all of Jeff Morrissette's rants about
California I am surprised there was no mention about the biggest threat to
California - illegal immigration from third world countries. Perhaps I
missed something. Does Mr. Morrissette even live in California? From
what perspective is he evaluating Californias flaws, the Moon? How can
he speak on behalf of California citizens when he is so far removed from
the real problem? While some of his concerns might be valid, I don't
think they represent the biggest threats to our state. I really do think
it might be in the best interest of California if we become independent
from the federal government that is supposedly responsible for securing
our borders, but there are many unanswered questions. Additionally, if
the new California government is just as clueless about the real
threats to California as Mr. Morrissette seems to be then the whole notion of
independence is irrelevant.
--Bryan (Rancho Cucamonga, CA)
||If you put more emphasis on California's illegal immigration
problem rather than focusing on religion, I might consider your idea
more worthwhile. You make many good points but there's too much emphasis
on the 'religious impact' and find it to be a bit far fetched when you
compare it to the destruction caused by illegals. It's true,
California needs some MAJOR overhauling! But not without addressing the illegal
immigration issue as well.
--Marilyn (Inland Empire, CA)
||Go! The sooner the better. I'd love to see you prosper with
all the social handouts for all the illegals you so openly welcome.
Leave, we support your independance.
Make sure you take Striesand, Baldwins, Asners and the rest of your
intellectuals with you.
--Brett (Las Vegas, NV)
||While the debate of California secession is fun (albeit
unrealistic and improbable), I share Kevin’s sentiment that your attacks on
Christianity are disturbing. I guess I'm a member of the so-called
religious right. Guess what? We don’t have any secret meeting setting
fourth an agenda, our leaders typically don’t tell us who to vote for, and
we don’t desire a theocracy. We happen to have many values that are in
common, but (in general) we don’t want legislate religion for that
would defeat the purpose of faith (individual choice). Most of us don’t
want religion taught in public schools, because we want our children to
share our values. I don’t know of anyone that wants to make
homosexuality illegal, but I’m sure saying things like that inflames your base.
Most Christians believe in what the founders truly meant by the now
misinterpreted and overreaching “separation of church and state”. Words
which never appear in our constitution, but rather are contained in a letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists. Our
constitution merely prohibits congress from establishing a national religion
or prohibiting the free expression thereof. Even if you look at
Jefferson’s own words in the context of the letters, it’s clear that his
intent was not so much to keep religion out of government, but rather to
keep government out of religion. If the religious right made this
election happen, then it was probably a silent visceral reaction to the
unrelenting assaults on religion. We have a teacher unable to teach the
declaration of independence because it says that our “creator” has granted
us certain unalienable rights. Forget religious, this is just history.
We have a former governor that renamed the Christmas tree to the
“Holiday Tree”. And of course the exclusion from public facilities all
organizations which might have anything to do with God or even mention
“God”. The religious right is not voting in a block, they are voting common values. You didn’t care for the results of the last election, but imagine how you would galvanize the base by polarizing an issue
such as this with anti-religious rhetoric. It occurs to me that you
want democracy so long as the results are consistent with your desires.
The framers of our country were wise men. I don’t see the same wisdom
here. Where is your constitution (and please don’t tell me you want to
adopt the hundreds of pages in the California constitution)? How will
you rally support with no direction, just complaints. Do expect this
to occur with no military action? The US founders gave us the “right to
bear arms” and required a “well armed militia” so that we might protect
ourselves from tyranny, but my guess is you dig gun control. Southern
California imports a great deal of water from other states. How do we
keep from being held hostage? Unlike Texas, we share a power grid with
other states. How will you dismantle this infrastructure and ensure
continued service? How do you intend on protecting our borders from
those nasty Americans that just want to consume the endless array of social
services you will no doubt establish? I’m just getting warmed up. I
don’t think you have an inkling of the scope of this effort, or can you rally the necessary support within California to
significantly move forward. This effort is nothing more than a joke. The US
Constitution is well thought out. You have a better chance of fixing
what’s broken here than creating a “better” country of your own. I agree
your position on many of the problems we have in California, but in the
absence of true “tyranny” I don’t find your solution plausible or
--Lee (Brea, CA)
||I have lived all my life in California and it is the
absolute best place in the world to live. I live in an area where I am about
1 hour from everything, beautiful mountains, sunny beaches, windswept
deserts and great sports venues. I can take my son on a different
adventure every weekend and the weather, while occasionally hot, is usually
spectacular. These are the great things about California, now for the
bad. I commute 134 miles round trip per day in ever increasing traffic
to get to work. I pay over $700 per month to send my son to private
school so he can have a proper education, and he is learning Spanish as
an elective class, not as a mandatory one. Kids (14 and younger) with
Spanish surnames and who spoke broken English broke into my brand new
house in my brand new neighborhood. I am half Mexican, but my family
immigrated here legally over 100 years ago. I know that I would be
considered a traitor to my race by some of my family and friends, but the cold hard facts are that we cannot sustain an ever-increasing
torrent of illegals coming over the border. It drains our economy,
endangers those living here, and worst of all is that California has been
completely abandoned by the Federal Government. We are not even a whistle
stop during elections. I say that if our government has turned its back
on us it’s time for us to turn our backs on it. If California, or even
just Southern California, opted for Independence, at the very least we
would get the attention of the government. The would see that
Californians are tired of having our money taken from us to support other
states and receive nothing in return. Saying that illegal aliens crossing
our border by the millions is hurting California is not racist, it’s the
truth and it’s time Californian’s did something about it.
--Jeffrey (Beaumont, CA)
||Well if this is what we have to do to get attention and let
the government know we are tired of being dumped on and not getting
protection from the invasion from the south or reimbursed for the cost
also. I am a native Californian tired of watching my state get raped buy
the government and left to hold the bag when its all said and done.
California for Californians sounds good but not as good as California’s
destiny to be determined by Californians.
--Javier (Downey, CA)
||Sounds good, but has some major problems. If we have nothing
to do with the Federal government how do we handle social security,
Medicare, FDA issues, Coast Guard, FAA, security of our borders, etc?
--Tom (Valencia, CA)
||I'm a fifth-generation Californian, the descendant of
pioneers from the South. Some of my ancestors are buried in Orcutt (near
Sta. Maria), in what is now an historical-landmark graveyard.
All I can say is, it's about time that we return to the original intent
-- i.e.: the California Republic. All we aare to the rest of the U.S. is an ATM for projects we don't even support!
--Carol (Ventura, CA)
||Thank you for standing up.
The fact that we have a moron for a “president” that uses his religious
beliefs to make decisions about my basic rights makes me sick. Doesn’t
that kind of sound like the Taliban?
I just want to go to bed for four years and hope for the best.
Jesusland is evil and is looking to force religion on everyone. Again… it
sounds like the Taliban to me.
--John (Van Nuys, CA)
I heard you on the John & Ken show today. I will probably miss many
things I'd like to touch on concerning this topic in this space... but
I would be for secession for numerous reasons. You mentioned the tax
money that the fedgov sucks from California and Ken spoke of the illegal
alien/border problem that our current leaders refuse to address. Both
were good points.
I believe that division in general is a good thing (contrary to the
current attitude of the globalist powers that be). Dividing Southern &
Northern California into seperate countries could even have its merits.
Although I understand you just want to get the topic up for discussion,
I have a serious problem with the anti-Christian theme that runs
through some of the motivational remarks for considering secession. Please
allow me to explain.
As a born-again Christian who believes the Holy Bible, I could not
support any effort to create a radical, Socialist California as a country
unto itself. What I could support would be a California country whose
foundation holds to the founding documents of the United States (which
are no longer adhered to by the U.S.) without a private activist wresting
of the actual written words.
I believe one of our greatest failures as a people is the failure to
discipline ourselves to see politicians and political parties for who
they really are. Along with that, we fail to stop voting for those who
sell us out on the premise that any vote not for a Republican or Democrat
is "throwing a vote away".
I believe, in reality, that the two major parties are simply variant
philosophies of a Socialist model.
The Republican Party is much like Nazi Fascism with its public-private
partnerships and hyper-patriotism. Having departed from true
conservatism and embraced a fraudulent Socialist form (neo-conservatism), we get
attacks on liberty like the Patriot Act.
The Democratic Party is much like Soviet Communism with its
welfare-state ideas of income redistribution, banishment of God and Jesus Christ
from the public square along with tax burdens to stifle the spirit of
While I take issue with your idea that the Southern states had a wrong
moral reason for trying to secede (as a matter of free will, to do so
is never wrong), I think what happened to them would likely happen to
California as well. That being an attack by the rest of the Union (Civil
War) to bring California back in. For kingdom-builders with big brother
dreams, independent thinking, segregation and secession threaten their
--Kevin (Upland, CA)